There is but one consideration for borders around the globe. Sovereignty. Sovereignty is a legal claim to nation status. All nations claim sovereignty but only one nation, The United States of America was founded to form a more perfect union of territorial states. We citizens are ideally ensured domestic tranquility, a country to call home, where our right to life, liberty and the pursuit happiness shall be guarded against outside forces by a citizen militia, bolstered with adequate Federal military protection to provide for the common defense of ‘We the people’. Borders function to delineate our safe space, to use the modern PC vernacular, where U.S. citizen’s inalienable rights as codified in ‘The Bill of Rights’ are protected first, foremost and without debate, ideally to promote (not to be confused with provide) the general welfare. The preamble of our Constitution is not a ‘clause’, nor enumeration of federal powers. It’s an edict of basic tenets; principles if one prefers. We as Americans (a claim many make of themselves, whether anchored to our founding tenets or not / another essay forthcoming) either respect the idea of America, or we do not. We either cherish and protect our sovereignty concurrent with an expectation other nations encourage their citizens do the same, or we do not. This rightful, human rights respecting position does not make anyone racist, bigoted or isolationist, nor does it connote white supremacy, advocate chauvinism or imply domination or scorn of other nations or it’s peoples as acceptable.
The prevailing border insanity is an abdication of rational law enforcement and national sovereignty. This madness is a crisis for both Mexico and the United States. Our politicians use it as a tool of division, and Mexican officials concurrent with an incestuous relationship with criminal cartels condone the mayhem as well. For Mexico’s officials a porous border serves as a sieve to vent undesirables. Here I do not refer to drug smugglers, human traffickers, terrorists or any criminal element the Trump card points to. No, I use undesirables relative to people who are unable or unwilling to perform under or conform to Mexico’s corrupt national government which operates almost without exception via graft and foments nearly ubiquitous failure to promote the general welfare regarding citizens, lands, or productive enterprise. Also, it must be noted roughly 43 other ethnic groups who flee impoverished, war torn nations filter through Mexico as well. Fleeing systemic shitholism seems the only alternative for many, obviously… and of course elites, despots and tin horn dictators who occupy dysfunctional power structures worldwide are often glad to see malcontents go rather than stay to demand change or confront those holding power. It should also be acknowledged a large contingent of Mexicans and (Americans?) do not honor the 1848 Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo which established the current border between our two sovereign nations. There are several organizations operating across international lines dedicated to undermine Mexican – American border stability for political purposes. A great deal of money flows to finance so called ‘caravans’ as well as the constant trickle of smaller groups and individuals. Illegal crossings are on pace to reach 1 million in 2019. This represents invasion of a sovereign land and should not to be referred to as immigration.
So, why is there a debate? Seriously, why would a single U.S. citizen not value the sovereignty of their own nation and their birthright in sufficient measure to reject rampant, insane disregard for orderly immigration enforcement? Let’s scratch the surface a bit.
‘Progressivism’ is a movement away from the fore referenced tenets of our Constitutionally limited, Representative Republic toward a pure democracy or more precisely, mob rule. The progressive movement is predicated on the false idea our Constitution is a “living, breathing document.” It is not. The primary tools leftist progressives have always used are derision, deception, division, and most efficacious, distortion and manipulation of history to denigrate those who came before, including our imperfect founders. Progressivism was not historically nor currently limited to leftists. Both sides of the aisle and most citizens are currently infected. Progressives infiltrated American education at the turn of the 20th century. The premise of John Dewey and others, was that public educators rightfully held the keys and moral high ground to engineer and mold society. A society wherein the populace will have been sculpted into civility by an authoritarian bureaucracy, thus creating a ‘gentle mob’ if you will; and now in modernity, none so gentle as those who should not be here at all. Criminality aside, self preservation deems illegal inhabitants for the most part keep their heads down. Without immersion into the idea of America, you know… that dirty, racist, bigoted, intolerant ‘assimilation’ some of us refer to, most here illegally passively tow the line for those whom they believe to be magnanimous benefactors that advocate for them irrespective of cultural participation or adherence to national policy. One political party in the U.S. counts on it, both literally and figuratively.
The history I was taught in late 1960’s elementary school was with fraught with hero worship and omission of human tragedy associated with pioneering, settling and conquest of lands here and elsewhere. High school history in the 70’s certainly incorporated more realism, but was still taught top down so to speak, wherein patriotism, admiration and reverence for folk heroes, political figures and the like were key elements foisted upon students to maintain a sense of national pride, with great emphasis to memorize dates and names relative to pivotal events and accomplishments. These days public education takes quite a different tack. The focus exaggerates the perspective of the disenfranchised, victims and inequities of our nation’s expansive, unprecedented growth and of course includes vilification of explorers who, to hear it today, brought only exploitation, disease, racism, ethnic cleansing and war. Of course public schools and the collegiate system are not the only purveyors of bottom up re-education; Hollywood, the media, musicians, artists, those oh so boorish late night comedians and many so called modern economists promulgate these precepts as well. There is no wonder so many think so little of their own country. Balanced perspective between outright falsehood and ugly truth is only available through exploration which implores one to inquire beyond the places teachers teach, preachers preach or the politicians and pundits screech. A sizable swath of U.S.citizens have bought into relentless America bashing and are convinced our nation is somehow more ruthless, barbarous, unethical, and of course privileged than other nations forged in the fires of tumultuous history. Many believe it so simply because our founders had less melanin content than those who were here before, our founders philosophical, intellectual considerations be damned. Incidentally, most immigrants who lawfully achieve the dream would summarily disagree with those who hold little regard for the idea of America. As to the spoils of exploration, pioneering and conquest; yes indigenous people (of color because somehow that makes it worse, it does not) on this continent lost out to overwhelming forces, settlers and industrialists who occupied the land. Indeed there were slaveholders, indentured servitude, suffering, terrible loss for many, tremendous gains by others and as with any historic upheaval where territories are in dispute, atrocities occurred. Such is the case throughout human history, but loathing one’s own country having been fed a steady diet of how inequitable and evil U.S. history is dare I say besides inaccurate, wholly unfair. Hell, there would be no Latin America, Mexico, or Mexican people had Spanish Conquistadors not plundered and decimated the South American continent wiping out huge, arguably more advanced civilizations than those conquered in North America. Mexico exists as a direct result of exploration by superior forces which resulted in conquest, inequities, exploitation with winners taking the spoils. Relative to world history, there is nothing uniquely horrendous about U.S. history.
In absence of accurate, contextual historical perspective many now believe denigrating their own nation and tolerance of lawless migration is the least they can do to absolve the supposed sins of our past. I understand from where the mindset emanates, but cannot imagine for one second how being possessed of it feels. There is NO rational reason for any individual to condone the current mess on the border. In no way does the blood letting of humanity from one geographic location to another equate to compassion, nor will it mitigate delusional, misguided ‘white guilt’ and ‘prosperity shame’ inherent in the self destructive ‘Progressive’ movement. Or, put another way, we do not owe Mexico or any other nation a damn thing other than to be neighborly and uphold trade agreements. We owe ourselves the opportunity to get our domestic, economic and cultural affairs in order concurrent with adherence to lawful, orderly, simple and gracious immigration policy predicated on one’s desire to be a U.S. Citizen and an American.
As Thomas Sowell states, “A country that does not control it’s borders doesn’t have an immigration policy.”
If one does not believe they deserve to live well in a sovereign land, one will cast the value of their own citizenship to the wayside. D L Silva
Four; the number of times I have been cruised by slovenly, unshaven, apparently desperate male senior citizens whilst on a local park jogging path here on the Big Island of Hawaii. Ok, for starters I am a highly hygienic, reasonably fit, well coiffed man so there’s that, so please… Look, I take no issue with being hit on, but seriously fellas, clean yourselves up, take a shave… I don’t know, join a gym, buy some threads with sleeves. Yes, let’s take this moment to ask all men over fifty to leave the tank tops and sleeveless shirts home, irrespective of conditioning and especially in absence thereof. Take it from the guy who’s tried almost everything, if I were to take a swing, pallid, unkempt and desperate ain’t getting you into club Dave.
